Life on mars really??? Or
HereToOffend
|
Posted 10:10 am, 05/16/2019
|
So it is "ok" to rip a baby apart and kill it at any stage of pregnancy in your view? Even after birth? Where does it stop?
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 10:10 am, 05/16/2019
|
Aborted fetus skin isn't pliable enough to tan. If you want to be ridiculous let's go all the way.
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 10:07 am, 05/16/2019
|
Sarge sure does like to pout when he starts to lose an argument.
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 9:46 am, 05/16/2019
|
Sustainable life. That's what has been said.
Some of you have listened to way to much propaganda "fake news".
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 9:41 am, 05/16/2019
|
thats a win-win from your perspective.
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 9:40 am, 05/16/2019
|
you should open your own business making fine leather goods from tanned baby-skins
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 9:38 am, 05/16/2019
|
It's funny that pregnant women in bikinis offends you but not a table full of mutilated baby-parts
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 9:38 am, 05/16/2019
|
Good grief. You sure do make leaps.
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 9:36 am, 05/16/2019
|
so there's no compromising on yalls side at all?
so women should be allowed to rip a full-term fetus limb from limb for convenience and absolutely nothing less?
it's amusing that the word "barbaric" gets thrown around so loosely to describe my views on the matter.
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 8:52 am, 05/16/2019
|
I don't see why a woman has to compromise.
It's not my body or your body.
So let's lock up every woman that smokes or drinks during pregnancy, **** 3/4 of Wilkes women would go to jail. If we are going to control women let's do it right. I say pregnant women should not wear belly shirts or bikinis. It offends me.
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 5:18 am, 05/16/2019
|
Do you just get off on forcing women to do things against their will?
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 6:17 pm, 05/15/2019
|
if you were a legislator hangs, how would you feel about my compromise?
|
sgtkracka
|
Posted 6:16 pm, 05/15/2019
|
here's the extent of my compromising if i were a legislator.
abortion would be acceptable for rape, incest, endangerment of the mother's life, or non-viability of the fetus.
i would like for convenience abortions to not be allowed at all....but in an effort to reach some kind of compromise, i would allow them before viability which is generally accepted to be 22-24 weeks.
for anything past the viability cut-off, they should take the baby via c-section and incubate it until it can be put in foster care.
It's definitely not ideal for either side but it's as far as i would be willing to stretch to reach a compromise.....but my hand would be shaking while trying to sign the bill into law....and then i would probably vomit all over it so they would have to print a new copy for me to sign again.
|
Hangsleft
|
Posted 6:03 pm, 05/15/2019
|
If the mother is speeding?
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 5:04 pm, 05/15/2019
|
Abortion is an intentional act to end development, and thus life, of a fetus. It is disingenuous to include accidents and disease caused fetal demise.
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 4:58 pm, 05/15/2019
|
If a pregnant woman crashes her car and causes a natural abortion, can we charge her with man slaughter?
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 4:53 pm, 05/15/2019
|
Don’t get mad at hangs because he’s destroying you.
You debate like Ben Shapiro.
|
HereToOffend
|
Posted 4:50 pm, 05/15/2019
|
hangsleft (view profile) | Posted 4:46 pm, 05/15/2019 | Because the murderer took away the woman's right to choose. You see that argument makes the pro-choice point. Thanks
|
Right the choice to end another life. Can we abort you?
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 4:48 pm, 05/15/2019
|
And they can only be charge if the fetus would be viable outside the womb.
So there's that as well.
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 4:46 pm, 05/15/2019
|
Because the murderer took away the woman's right to choose. You see that argument makes the pro-choice point. Thanks
|
|
|