Thomas Tillis and change to ACA...
tdad
|
Posted 8:37 am, 10/02/2014
|
Insurance companies are required to pay over 80 percent of premiums back in claims. There is no underwriting anymore. This year all the folks who needed major organ transplant surgery jumped on board. Premiums have to rise. If the healthy folks get in increases should level off to a more reasonable amount. Everyone hates the premiums, but when a surgery can cost a hundred grand, what do you expect?
|
Osmosis
|
Posted 8:08 am, 10/02/2014
|
If hospitals, doctors, and pharmacys had to compete for your business I think the prices would go down. The insurance companies would want to send you to the places that provided the best service for the least amount.Doctors and Hospitals would have to quit charging whatever they desire. Insurance companies would have competition with the price of premiums. What makes me PO'ed about the government is the fact that they have never tried to do anything about the exorbitant costs of health services. That lets me think that the doctors and health care corporations pushed the Obama Plan. My wife's doctor thinks it's the best thing since sliced bread. When the democrats attack Tillis and others by saying where's their plan I want the Republicans to say, We have no plan. What would be wrong with letting things go back to where we were. The ACA hasn't helped anybody I've talked to.
|
Repub-we-can
|
Posted 5:54 am, 10/02/2014
|
wrestlers Grandpa (view profile) | Posted 7:00 pm, 10/01/2014 | Thom Tillis will vote to replace ACA....like the other GOP Senators what specifically will he replace the ACA with and if it passes what do those who are covered by ACA do if the Health Insurers decide that they no long have to cover them.....those who have life threatening diseases that medications keep them alive...what about those in chemo therapy to halt or destroy the cancer cells,,,, the next Senate Debate is Oct 7...hope the moderator will ask that question.....as for Medicare let him talk about that... |
How did this thread get hijacked and off the original thought pattern. Can you democrats not follow a game plan at all? This was suppose to be a thread about Republicans killing the sick and injured. It is to get us off the topics of Democrats War on Women, Obamas disapproval rating ,and Secret Service failures and such. Come on get with the program , if this killing the sick talking is not covered we cannot move on to starving children.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 5:29 am, 10/02/2014
|
Executive Director for the Centre for Auto Safety in his statement before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in Washington D.C., September 20, 2000[2] stated "Emerging Information shows that both Ford and Firestone had early knowledge of tread separation in Firestone Tires fitted to Ford Explorer vehicles but at no point informed the NHTSA of their findings".
Even with governmental oversight they have sold faulty products before.
|
NChillBilly11175
|
Posted 2:33 am, 10/02/2014
|
Thom Tillis ain't gonna win. The legions of welfare dependents and all those registered Democrats voting from beyond the grave will see to it.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 9:07 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Oh, I don't think any corporation has a real interest in morality or ethics (except maybe Hobby Lobby and Chick Fil A). Most of the big corporations have skeletons in their closets and make cozy deals with officials (whichever party may be in power). We are learning that in many cases the regulators are paid for by the wolves they are supposed to watch. Some level of shenanigans is sadly to be expected.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 9:02 pm, 10/01/2014
|
It seems like we are in agreement sparkling. Just you seem to think Govt and regulation are winning the power struggle.
I see it as big pharma has the government in its back pocket.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 9:02 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Hey, Cagey, even if there were no govt inspector, don't you think the automotive companies have a vested interest in their customers safety. Death is really bad for sales, you know.
|
scratch
|
Posted 9:01 pm, 10/01/2014
|
BCBS must have invested last year.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 9:00 pm, 10/01/2014
|
It would seem that BCBS is making a fortune off the ACA. In that, I agree, scratch.
|
scratch
|
Posted 8:57 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Americans pay far more for much less. Big pharma and insurance corporations reap tremendous profits on the backs of taxpayers. Government policy has been manipulated by corrupt but legal lobbying to protect those trillions.
I am very thankful that my Dr. Is not one who lacks empathy and compassion. Because that's a recipe for a really tishty medical professional IMO.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 8:56 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Wrong again. I looked back at all my posts on this thread. At 7:50 I said that smart and useful regulation were necessary.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 8:53 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Quit back peddling. You said no regulation in medicine and automotive industry
You have a foolish idea that you haven't really thought about the consequences of.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 8:51 pm, 10/01/2014
|
What I'm not for is regulation that takes on a life of its own.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 8:50 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Wow.
You're are either a dare devil or a fool. If like to know if my brakes, tires, etc. Have been tested and proven safe.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 8:50 pm, 10/01/2014
|
Oops, that was sure to the first statement. I'm all for reasonable regulation.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 8:49 pm, 10/01/2014
|
And people's livelihood and well being shouldn't be the most profitable by a abhorrent margin.
Would you be for no regulation in the automotive industry?
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 8:47 pm, 10/01/2014
|
When the lives of the consumers are part of the question there must be at the very least governmental oversight and regulation.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 8:47 pm, 10/01/2014
|
It's not ridiculous at all. Every company is in business to make a profit. Some want to make the biggest profit legally available to them. Others choose to reinvest some portion of their profits in altruistic projects. Only the investors get to develop company policy.
|
|
|